Monday, April 22, 2013

A thesis for shorting Canadian oil service companies



With oil prices recently drifting lower, companies in the Canadian oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) business have seen significant share price declines.  Some of the more marginal names in the space have even seen precipitous share price drops of 50% or more.  While I don’t think the bottom is in quite yet for the sector, the risks of shorting the E&Ps at this point may not justify the potential rewards.  On the other hand, oil services companies are showing signs of weakness, which I believe will continue.

The thesis is as follows:

The three primary sources of capital for oil and gas E&Ps are equity, debt, and joint ventures.  All of these sources of financing are likely to become more difficult to secure if oil prices continue to decline.

Lower share prices make equity financing unattractive

Falling share prices make equity a more expensive way to raise capital as more shares need to be issued to raise the same amount of cash.  And while a high cost of equity does not always stop determined companies from raising money in the equity markets, it does limit the amount of capital that can be raised through share issuance.

Lower oil prices limit growth in credit lines

The oil and gas business is risky, and banks are usually unwilling to lend money to risky businesses without hard collateral.  In the E&P business, this collateral usually takes the form of oil and gas reserves.  The value of those reserves fluctuates with the price of oil and gas, and when prices are falling banks are more reluctant to extend loans.  Credit growth will therefore be limited.

Joint Venture financing may have peaked in 2012

The JV capital that has sustained much of the industry over the past few years will also be harder to come by as the Asian national oil companies (NOCs) that have driven recent JV activity already claimed their stakes.  Many of these NOCs were also willing to pay a premium to acquire technology and experience with unconventional oil and gas.  It is unlikely that future JV agreements will be as favorable to the Canadian E&P industry as this strategic technology premium falls off.

A larger share of future CAPEX will need to be internally funded

All of these factors will make financing exceedingly difficult for E&Ps in the near future, assuming oil prices continue to grind lower.  This means the industry will be forced to live within its cash flows – something it hasn’t had to do for a very long time.  Many companies have already started to make the transition to lower, internally driven CAPEX, but the big adjustment is yet to come.  I ran some numbers and found that the E&P sector is outspending operating cash flow by 10-15%.  This is before paying dividends or buying back shares!

Lower E&P CAPEX = Lower service industry revenue

The implications to the service industry are dire.  If E&Ps are forced to reign in spending by 10-15% (or more assuming they want to continue paying dividends or rebuild stretched balance sheets), we can expect revenue to the service industry to drop by at least that much.  Due to the asset heavy nature of the services industry, where small changes in utilization rates lead to massive swings in earnings, we could see these earnings at these companies get crushed. 

I don’t think share prices of service companies are adequately pricing in this risk.  While these companies may look cheap on a yield or P/E basis, they are classic value traps.  Earnings are a trailing measure - if you believe oil prices will drop, these companies are going to be money losers over the next few years.  And if you don’t, you are better off in the E&Ps, which look even cheaper by the same metrics.

Conclusions

If the thesis is correct, it sets up a fairly low risk trade – go long select E&Ps, and get short service companies.  If oil prices recover, the E&Ps will bounce back, limiting your downside risk on the trade.  If oil prices continue to drop, the E&Ps will get hit hard, but the service companies will be decimated.

Recommendations: Short FRC.TO, CFW.TO, TRW.TO, PD.TO.  Risk averse investors may want to pair with a long position in high quality E&Ps.

No comments:

Post a Comment